Another Hard Question

Here is where the info stands with regards to Sparkle:

  • The infusion of bisphosphonates failed to give Sparkle the bounce we were hoping.

  • The second cytology did not clarify the nature of the lesion in Sparkle’s right femur. In fact, it added confusion.

  • We do seem pretty confident that the leg lesion and the long-standing mass in her lung are not the same thing.

  • The lung mass is just hanging out and does not seem to be marching Sparkle towards her demise.

  • Sparkle is three-legged from pain, even though we are aggressively managing the pain.

  • I do not want to have to euthanize Sparkle for pain 💔

Sparkle continues to do all her usual Sparkle things — she is engaging…

View of my lap

Picking up bowls…

And just happy to be here with us…

Hanging with my girls — Sparkle next to me, Pozy looking up, and then Capella

But that leg hurts.

A bone biopsy was rejected by the specialists because of fracture risk. The consensus is that it is highly unlikely the leg lesion is something that can be treated in a way that would allow Sparkle to use the leg again in a normal way.

I have to be her proxy and so I have considered her answer to this question:

Sparkle, would you rather stay here with pain, head for the Rainbow Bridge, or be officially three-legged for the rest of your life with short-term recovery pain but then no leg pain?

“None of the above” is not an answer choice.

And so Sparkle is scheduled for amputation surgery on Wednesday.